Skip navigation
Previous Next

Great Minds and Learning

May 2009
1

‘Just as eating against one’s will is injurious to health, so study without a liking for it spoils the memory and retains nothing it takes in’

Leonardo Da Vinci c.1500

 

 

 

He may have been a great artist, inventor and the consummate renaissance man, but it appears that Leonardo Da Vinci was somewhat slack in other areas. Firstly, what is that he’s saying about eating? It seems a strange assertion. When my mother made me eat all the vegetables on my plate I was none too happy about it. In fact, this unwilling eating led to regular tantrums. But now I have a few hairs on my chest I can see that my health hasn’t been as adversely affected as Leonardo might have me believe. Maybe familial dinner table politics were somewhat more dangerous in renaissance Italy.

 

In terms of learning, schools days are ample example that we don’t have a liking for study but still retain and learn. Left to their own devices rather than chivvied by parents, would children voluntarily go to learn? We can only speculate as to the answer. The point is that often we are compelled and often coerced into learning when we are young yet it is ultimately beneficial to us though we don’t know it at the time. To progress, there is much study we don’t like that we have to get through.

 

Even when we have chosen to study by choice, like at university, there is often little recall of the facts and information imparted to us. Though I suspect here we are learning a way of thinking and approaching information rather than ‘useful’ knowledge that we will use later on. Studying only what one likes does not guarantee learning. Often it is the result of the study we want, we are actually not prepared to put in the hard work.

 

Do children and young people know what is best for them? Would they be limiting themselves is they only studied what they liked? These days it is difficult to tell people what is good or bad for them. But surely many of us are thankful for having done something that we originally didn’t want to do. Though anecdotes are poor proofs, I can think of several situations where I am incredibly thankful now for being forced to learn something I was unwilling to when younger. Perhaps the problem is finding someone with the authority and someone we trust to know what is best for us.

 

Having said this, some of what Da Vinci says rings true. The classic example in my case is having to learn Latin in school. I’m sure many remember reciting by rote verb conjugations like mantras, amo, amass, amat, amatus... But what on earth does any of it mean to me now? I can’t say I liked it – bar some brilliant Roman myths – and sure enough have retained next to nothing. What remains of that Latin has little meaning. Whether it has spoiled my memory I can’t say. Some might say so.

 

The point here is twofold. Firstly, because a ‘great’ figure says it, it doesn’t mean it’s true. Although this quote from Da Vinci, though not widely cited, has survived several centuries, it is still a questionable (just like the thoughts contained in these few paragraphs) statement. Secondly, we shouldn’t automatically consider doing things against our will as negative. A healthy glow from eating those once hated vegetables is proof enough.

 

 

 

18 May 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


1

In the 3rd Century BC, Aristotle is reported to have said, ‘To learn is a natural pleasure, not confined to philosophers, but common to all men.’

 

 

We can only wonder if the philosopher ever faced a class of glum adolescents who felt an out of hours extra curricular English class as primarily an oppression and a burden rather than a joyous pleasure. Is Aristotle's ideal of learning in fact rather questionable? We can only imagine that learning for Aristotle was lounging about in the Greek sunshine surrounded by beautiful temples and olive groves, or strolling in the rolling hills around Athens with other like minded people discussing this and that at their leisure. When your teacher was the great Socrates, perhaps it was easy to have such a pleasant view of learning. However, not all of us had the words of that bearded mastermind to hang on. Was Aristotle ever put in a grey, featureless classroom and told ‘You’ll be thankful you did it later in life’?

 

It often seems that the natural pleasure in learning is an acquired taste gained at a stage in life after adolescence or even well into adulthood. How many of us can really say we applied ourselves fully at school, or even when more grown up at university? How many of us regret giving up learning a musical instrument while young because we’d rather be playing outside or watching television? Do you regret not taking advantage of your opportunities to learn when you were younger? Don’t have the time now? Aristotle’s statement might seem a touch on the shaky side when presented with this evidence. Perhaps he was having an off day when he came up with this one. Not up to his usual standard.

 

But it would be interesting to know if people have other ideas on this. Have you ever encountered a class of adolescents beaming with joy at the opportunity to learn? Does it all depend on the context and the quality of the teacher? Or do we even become more closed to learning as we get older? More stuck in our ways and blinkered.

 

So Aristotle’s little quotation gives us pause for thought on what motivates us to learn. Is learning an innate impulse or do we only do it when coerced, to achieve something specific and beneficial to us or simply because we’ve grown up?